PILLARS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM

PILLARS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM


PillarKey ComponentsFunction
UN SystemSecurity Council, General Assembly, ICJ, specialized agenciesConflict resolution, peacekeeping, international law adjudication
International LawTreaties, conventions, customary law, jus cogens normsEstablishes rules for state conduct, war, trade, human rights
Economic InstitutionsIMF, World Bank, WTO, regional development banksFinancial stability, trade regulation, development assistance
Security AlliancesNATO, bilateral defense treaties, collective security pactsDeterrence, mutual defense, military cooperation
Nuclear Non-ProliferationNPT, IAEA, CTBT, nuclear weapon-free zonesPrevent weapons spread, verify compliance, arms control
Human Rights FrameworkUDHR, ICC, regional courts, humanitarian lawProtect individual rights, prosecute atrocities

MAJOR WEAKNESSES


WeaknessDescriptionImpact
Veto Power AbuseP5 members block resolutions for national interestsParalysis on Syria, Ukraine, Israel-Palestine conflicts
Enforcement GapNo global police force, relies on voluntary complianceWeak punishment for violations, selective enforcement
Power AsymmetryUS/Western dominance in institutions since 1945Legitimacy crisis, Global South resentment, parallel systems emerging
Sovereignty ShieldStates hide behind non-interference principleEnables internal atrocities, blocks humanitarian intervention
Resource InequalityDeveloped nations control funding and decision-makingPoor nations have voice but no real power
Selective JusticeICC only prosecutes African/weaker state leadersPerceived as neo-colonial tool, powerful states immune
Treaty Non-ComplianceNo binding enforcement mechanism for most agreementsClimate, trade, arms control agreements routinely violated
Emerging ChallengesSystem designed for state actors, not cyber, terrorism, pandemicsStruggles with non-state threats, technology, global commons

STRUCTURAL CONTRADICTIONS


ContradictionProblem
Sovereign equality vs. practical hierarchyAll states "equal" but P5 have veto, weighted voting in IMF/World Bank
Universal values vs. cultural relativismHuman rights claims clash with diverse civilizational norms
Liberal order vs. authoritarian challengeChina/Russia propose alternative models, reject Western universalism
Interdependence vs. competitionEconomic integration exists alongside zero-sum security competition

Discard
Save
This page has been updated since your last edit. Your draft may contain outdated content. Load Latest Version
Was this article helpful?

On this page

Review Changes ← Back to Content
Message Status Space Raised By Last update on