The Chessboard

Palestine Power

The power that holds the occupation in place and the power that can end it — drawn from the Palestine opinions and the genocide goals built on them.

Power for the liberation of Palestine

Occupation rests on US arms and veto; enforced law, economic pressure and unity can end it

Israel, the occupying power, holds much of Gaza by force and is turning its occupation of the West Bank into annexation through land law, settlements and settler violence. United States arms, money, its Security Council veto and its sanctions on international judges shield Israel from the consequences. The world's highest courts have ruled the occupation unlawful and genocide plausible, but enforcing those rulings falls to states willing to act. That burden is moving to arms embargoes, trade cut-offs, divestment and coalitions of states, driven by public pressure, while Germany and Italy block the European Union's strongest lever. Divided Palestinian leadership, cautious Arab governments and Gaza governance imposed from outside weaken this opening.

Key points

  • What sustains the occupation. US arms, a $14bn aid package, the Security Council veto and sanctions on ICC judges let Israel ignore binding rulings while annexing the West Bank.
  • Law awaiting its enforcers. The ICJ, ICC and UN inquiry have found unlawful occupation and plausible genocide and issued arrest warrants; states' independent duty to prevent genocide makes enforcement their responsibility.
  • Economic leverage weighs most. Denying arms, military fuel, ports and trade hits hardest, as Turkiye, Spain, Slovenia and Norway's fund show, while suspension of the EU agreement remains blocked.
  • Routes around the veto. The Hague Group, grown from 12 to 40 nations, and the General Assembly's Uniting for Peace procedure can carry enforcement past Washington, though some members waver.
  • Publics move governments. Boycott, divestment, union and academic campaigns, with Muslim voters, pushed governments into recognitions and embargoes; recognition alone changes little without material pressure.
  • Duty of Muslim states. Muslim states hold border, mediation and funding leverage and must defend Al-Aqsa; Egypt's silencing of Al-Azhar shows why scholars' nasiha (sincere counsel) needs protection.
  • Palestinian unity and agency. Palestinian strength depends on turning the Beijing pledge into shared, elected institutions, rejecting outside-managed Gaza governance, and rebuilding with grants, not interest-bearing debt.

Drawn from